"Spend a few minutes reading College Football Resource" - Whit Watson, Sun Sports

"Maybe you should start your own blog" - Bruce Feldman, ESPN

"[An] Excellent resource for all things college football. It’s blog index is the definitive listing of the CFB blogosphere ... [A] must-read for fans." - Sports Illustrated (On Campus)

"The big daddy of them all, the nerve center of this twisted college football blogsphere" - The House Rock Built

"Unsurprisingly, College Football Resource has generated some discussion" -Dawg Sports

Top Teams 2008

After Week Seven

  1. Alabama
  2. Penn State
  3. Texas
  4. Oklahoma
  5. Florida
  6. USC
  7. Georgia
  8. LSU
  9. BYU
  10. Missouri
  11. Ohio State
  12. Oklahoma State
  13. Texas Tech
  14. Utah
  15. Kansas
  16. USF
  17. North Carolina
  18. Miami
  19. Boise State
  20. Georgia Tech
Search CFR
Submission Corner
« NFL Draft Heads Up | Main | Formulaic »


Here is more on the NCAA's new Academic Progress Report.

In the new system, an athlete receives one point per semester for remaining eligible and another point for staying in school. The newest point standings, calculated on a team-by-team basis, is only for the 2003-04 school year. The data for the 2004-05 year will be reported by December, when the NCAA will average together both years for each school's sports and then begin the penalty process. Eventually, a four-year rolling average will determine how teams fare, and the squad-size adjustment (upper confidence boundary) will be eliminated. Once a team's score dips below 925, it will be unable to replace for one year any student that leaves school before graduation and wouldn't have been academically eligible had he or she returned. No more than 10 percent of a team's scholarship limit can be eliminated in one year

For those curious, national champion USC had a 923 score, just below the NCAA cutoff of 925. By comparison, the other "subpar" sports of baseball and basketball had their champions score 888 (Cal State Fullerton, baseball) and 852 (Connecticut, basketball). These scores were for the 2003-2004 school year.

This initiative flew under the radar but with its impact on sholarships is certainly going to be very influential and hotly debated once prominent teams start receiving sanctions. That said, most athletic directors who have commented on the program are expressing optimism and patience.

PrintView Printer Friendly Version

EmailEmail Article to Friend

Reader Comments

There are no comments for this journal entry. To create a new comment, use the form below.

PostPost a New Comment

Enter your information below to add a new comment.

My response is on my own website »
Author Email (optional):
Author URL (optional):
All HTML will be escaped. Hyperlinks will be created for URLs automatically.