"Spend a few minutes reading College Football Resource" - Whit Watson, Sun Sports

"Maybe you should start your own blog" - Bruce Feldman, ESPN

"[An] Excellent resource for all things college football. It’s blog index is the definitive listing of the CFB blogosphere ... [A] must-read for fans." - Sports Illustrated (On Campus)

"The big daddy of them all, the nerve center of this twisted college football blogsphere" - The House Rock Built

"Unsurprisingly, College Football Resource has generated some discussion" -Dawg Sports

Top Teams 2008

After Week Seven

  1. Alabama
  2. Penn State
  3. Texas
  4. Oklahoma
  5. Florida
  6. USC
  7. Georgia
  8. LSU
  9. BYU
  10. Missouri
  11. Ohio State
  12. Oklahoma State
  13. Texas Tech
  14. Utah
  15. Kansas
  16. USF
  17. North Carolina
  18. Miami
  19. Boise State
  20. Georgia Tech
Search CFR
Submission Corner
« Ranking The Teams: Pac-10 | Main | Revised Top Teams List: July »

ESPN's Steady Drumbeat

On SportsCenter this morning:

"The SportsCenter Championship Series"

ESPN's college football staff is putting on its Swami hat to project each week of college football action and  top 10 rankings before projecting a 16-team playoff and national champion.

We'll see where they take this, but I'm sure the cynics will have a field day if preseason predictions ring hollow.  At worst it's a minor annoyance instead of hundred-decibel shoot-your-TV event as happened last year with the "USC 72, Jesus 13" slobberfest in December.  However, there is the possibility that ESPN's staff could harmonize around a program of their choice and restart that steady drumbeat thing again that gives birth to bloggers typing cynical anti-media screeds like The Narrative.

Their top 10 list as of today:

  1. Texas
  2. Ohio State
  3. USC
  4. West Virginia
  5. Notre Dame
  6. Auburn
  7. Iowa
  8. Florida State
  9. Miami
  10. Louisville

Also mentioned: LSU, Florida, Michigan, Clemson, Oklahoma

I'm not sure how any sensible person not living in Austin and whereabouts can choose Texas at No. 1 (two quarterbacks and they're both freshmen) so this thing is already on shaky ground.  Luckily, it's the preseason and this series doesn't matter all that much aside from energizing yap time at the water cooler for a few days.  No harm, no foul.

PrintView Printer Friendly Version

EmailEmail Article to Friend

References (1)

References allow you to track sources for this article, as well as articles that were written in response to this article.

Reader Comments (5)

Agreed about Texas. They have good talent, but I can't trust freshmen QBs for a BCS-ranked team. I think Ohio State is no.1, based on what they can do on offense with Troy Smith, Ted Ginn, and company.
August 14, 2006 | Unregistered CommenterRicky
I don't put much faith in the polls until at least week 4. By that time some major OOC games will be played and we will have a feel for who is a contender and who is a pretender.
August 14, 2006 | Unregistered CommenterMike
Here's my problem with the whole Ohio St. is #1 discussion. Why is it ok to say their offense should be great and therefore they are #1 but not ok to apply the same logic to Notre Dame who returns far more players on both sides of the ball?

I hate ND as much as the next guy (probably more seeing as I'm a USC alum and huge Trojan fan) but I'm not willing to blindly dismiss them just because of who they are (at least not when it comes to pre-season polls).

The fact is they return ridiculous talent on the offensive side and even where their defense wasn't great last year (remember they were running a brand new system) they still return almost their entire D as well. Compare that to Ohio St. who returns a ton of offensive skill players but lose almost their entire defense.

I just don't buy the Tressel is a great defensive coordinator argument - people said the same about Pete coming into last year and we all saw what happened in the Rose Bowl. Great defensive coachng can only take you so far, eventually the loss of talent (which USC experienced at an alarming rate over the course of the season) catches up to you.

I refuse to believe that some pundits are suggesting that Ohio St.'s offense will be on par with USC's of last year because IMO that is the kind of offense it takes to allow you to squeak by with the kind of defensive losses Ohio St has experienced.

My top 3:

ND - offense, offense, offense. Their D should be better too after a 2nd year in the system. Lots of returning starters.

USC - the D will carry them early and all their tough games are at home

Ohio St - explosive on O but too many defensive losses (2 returning starters on D!?)

That said I still doubt ND goes undefeated. We all saw how a great O and average D could struggle (see USC's close calls against ND, ASU and Fresno St). ND plays too tough of a schedule to win out and IMO loses at least 2 games - one early and one to USC :-)
August 14, 2006 | Unregistered CommenterDwigt
WVU and Louisvilel in the top ten, I DON'T THINK SO
August 14, 2006 | Unregistered CommenterTrojanHorse
I have been using a great site, its awsome there are all sorts of polls and stuff asking about all the things sports fans want to know. Its not one of those stupid sites run by and expert it is run by fans and fans only you guys should check it out: http://www.faniq.com/index.php?id=27887

FanIQ Sports Talk With A Score
August 16, 2006 | Unregistered CommenterNick S

PostPost a New Comment

Enter your information below to add a new comment.

My response is on my own website »
Author Email (optional):
Author URL (optional):
All HTML will be escaped. Hyperlinks will be created for URLs automatically.