"[An] Excellent resource for all things college football. It’s blog index is the definitive listing of the CFB blogosphere ... [A] must-read for fans." - Sports Illustrated (On Campus)
"The big daddy of them all, the nerve center of this twisted college football blogsphere" - The House Rock Built
"Unsurprisingly, College Football Resource has generated some discussion" -Dawg Sports
Why does this guy rank the UK below LSU? Did not UK beat LSU. Yes, now that I think of it, they did. Help me out. UK had on blue clothing, LSU had on yellow pants and white shirts. There were many people. The field was green with white stripes. Yes! I am sure of it. UK did beat LSU. I demand UK be given higher ranking. [http://www.collegefootballadvisor.com]
Well, it is not worth much. All you are saying is that LSU has been better than KY in the past, which may have been true. Suppose we are in a footrace and I lead you the entire time except the last 100 feet of the race. Then, you pass me and cross the finsih line first. Who wins? Using your criteria, me, because I was ahead most of the time. give it a rest.
Ok. we all now LSU would win when it comes down to it. But I think having Andre Johnson going up against Glenn Dorsey when there at there best would be the game of the year. But That wont happen because as i write this thread Glenn Dorsey is playing for the chiefs and i have absoulutley no idea what Johnson's doing write now.
Kentucky has to play a full season just like LSU. Teams are to be ranked on what they are, what they've accomplished, etc.
Under your model we should put Stanford ahead of USC. But what if USC beats Arizona State in a few weeks? Arizona State beat Stanford 41-3.
Stanford > USC
+
ASU > Stanford
+
USC > ASU
=
USC > ASU > Stanford > USC (???)
So what you propose collapses under its own weight, its a bogus and impossible way of ranking teams. Sorry.
http://google.com - google